Model comparison
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 vs Claude 3 Opus
- Input
- Free (open weights)
- Output
- Free (open weights)
- Context
- 128K
- Released
- 2024-06-17
- Input
- $15.00
- Output
- $75.00
- Context
- 200K
- Released
- 2024-03-04
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 and Claude 3 Opus split the 4 benchmarks both report evenly; Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window (200K vs 128K); DeepSeek-Coder-V2 ships open weights while Claude 3 Opus is API-only.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Spec | DeepSeek-Coder-V2 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Anthropic |
| Released | 2024-06-17 | 2024-03-04 |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | Undisclosed | 4K |
| Input price | Free (open weights) | $15.00 |
| Output price | Free (open weights) | $75.00 |
| Parameters | 236B total · 21B active (Lite: 16B total · 2.4B active) | Undisclosed |
| License | MIT (code) + DeepSeek Model License — commercial use permitted | Proprietary |
| Weights | Open weights | API only |
| Modalities | Text | Text, Vision |
| Knowledge cutoff | November 2023 | August 2023 |
Benchmarks both models report
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-Coder-V2 | Claude 3 Opus |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 90.2% | 84.9% |
| MATH | 75.7% | 60.1% |
| GSM8K | 94.9% | 95% |
| MMLU | 79.2% | 86.8% |
Scores are as published by each maker or its cited source; harness, reasoning effort and date can differ between rows, so treat small gaps as ties. Sources are listed on each model page.
Which one should you pick?
Pick DeepSeek-Coder-V2 if…
- You care about HumanEval, MATH (it scores higher on 2 shared benchmarks).
- You want to self-host or fine-tune (open weights, MIT (code) + DeepSeek Model License — commercial use permitted).
- Your use case is: code generation and autocompletion across many languages.
Pick Claude 3 Opus if…
- You care about GSM8K, MMLU (it scores higher on 2 shared benchmarks).
- You need the longer context (200K vs 128K).
- You need Vision input, which DeepSeek-Coder-V2 lacks.
- Your use case is: complex reasoning, analysis and long-document understanding over the 200K window.
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek-Coder-V2 or Claude 3 Opus?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 and Claude 3 Opus split the 4 benchmarks both report evenly; Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window (200K vs 128K); DeepSeek-Coder-V2 ships open weights while Claude 3 Opus is API-only. The better pick depends on whether you value benchmark scores, price per token, context length or openness for your workload.
What are the context windows of DeepSeek-Coder-V2 and Claude 3 Opus?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 offers 128K with up to Undisclosed output; Claude 3 Opus offers 200K with up to 4K output.
Is DeepSeek-Coder-V2 newer than Claude 3 Opus?
DeepSeek-Coder-V2 was released 2024-06-17; Claude 3 Opus was released 2024-03-04.
Go deeper
- DeepSeek-Coder-V2: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- Claude 3 Opus: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- claude opus 4 vs claude 3 opus
- gemma 2 vs deepseek coder v2
- gemma 2 vs claude 3 opus
- qwen2 5 coder vs deepseek coder v2
- pixtral 12b vs claude 3 opus
- gemini 1 5 flash vs claude 3 opus
- All model comparisons