█

AI/TLDR

LFM2.5-24B-A2B

A 24B mixture-of-experts reasoning model with about 2B active parameters, built for fast, private agents on-device

LFM (Liquid Foundation Models)Open weightsOpen weights on Hugging Face (BF16, FP8, GGUF, ONNX and MLX packings); API on Liquid Console
Released
13 Oct 2026
Context
128K
Parameters
24.0B total · 2.45B active
Input
$0.10 / 1M tokens
License
LFM Open License v1.0
Coverage
1 story

Overview

LFM2.5-24B-A2B is an open-weight reasoning model from Liquid AI, announced on the Liquid AI blog on October 13, 2026. It is a mixture of experts with 24.0B total parameters and 2.45B active per token (Liquid rounds this to about 2B, hence the A2B suffix), a 131,072-token context window and a 128,000-token vocabulary. Liquid describes it as the largest and final model in the LFM2.5 family, which runs from LFM2.5-230M up to this model, and it is a text-only model that always thinks before it answers: the chat template opens every assistant turn with a <think> tag.

It keeps the architecture of LFM2-24B-A2B (February 2026) — 40 layers, 30 of them double-gated short-convolution blocks and 10 grouped-query attention blocks, with 64 experts per MoE block and top-4 routing — and changes two things: the context window grows from 32K to 131K tokens, and the vocabulary doubles from 65K to 128K through an in-place tokenizer expansion for better non-Latin tokenization. Pre-training grew from about 17T to about 33T tokens, followed by 2T tokens of mid-training at 32K context and 300B tokens of long-context data at 131K. Post-training runs supervised fine-tuning, teacher specialization, two on-policy distillation stages (one non-agentic, one agentic) and agentic reinforcement learning inside the OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Pi and OpenCode harnesses, so the model learns their tools and system prompts.

Diagram of the LFM2.5-24B-A2B post-training recipe: base model to SFT, then non-agentic and agentic multi-domain on-policy distillation fed by specialist SFT+RL teachers, then agentic RL to the final model
The post-training pipeline: SFT, teacher specialization, two on-policy distillation stages and agentic RLLiquid AI model card ↗

On Liquid's own 16-benchmark comparison against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning (30B-A3B), it leads on AutomationBench (27.69), BFCLv4 (65.01), ToolSandbox (80.71), LiveClaw (48.09, against 38.19 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B) and τ³-Bench Banking, and on all three instruction-following tests: IFEval 96.75, IFBench 74.69 and Multi-IF 84.38. Liquid is explicit that larger models lead on knowledge-heavy and coding work: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 83.69 on GPQA Diamond to its 74.42, and 66.20 on SWE-Bench Verified (OpenCode) to its 51.00. The model card advises against using it alone for knowledge-heavy tasks and recommends pairing it with retrieval or web search.

Bar charts of prefill speed, decode speed and memory use for LFM2.5-24B-A2B, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning on Apple M5 Max, Mac Studio and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Edge inference: prefill and decode tokens/s and memory on three devices (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M)Liquid AI model card ↗

Speed is the headline. On Liquid's device benchmarks (llama.cpp, Q4_K_M, 4K-token input) it decodes 184 tokens/s on an Apple M5 Max and 114 tokens/s on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — up to 1.7× faster than the next-best compared model — while using the least memory of the four (15–16 GB). On a single NVIDIA B300 with SGLang and BF16 weights it passes 21K output tokens/s at high concurrency. Weights ship on Hugging Face in BF16, FP8, GGUF, ONNX and MLX packings alongside a separate base model, with support in Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, MLX and LM Studio; Liquid Console serves it by API at $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Use is governed by the LFM Open License v1.0, whose commercial-use rights stop at a company annual revenue threshold of $10 million.

Released2026-10-13
LicenseLFM Open License v1.0
WeightsOpen weights
Parameters24.0B total · 2.45B active
Context128K
ArchitectureHybrid mixture-of-experts: 40 layers (30 double-gated short-convolution blocks + 10 grouped-query attention blocks), 64 experts per MoE block with top-4 routing, 128K-token vocabulary
ModalitiesText
StatusOpen weights on Hugging Face (BF16, FP8, GGUF, ONNX and MLX packings); API on Liquid Console

Benchmarks

Grid of 16 bar charts comparing LFM2.5-24B-A2B with Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it and Nemotron-3.5-Lightning (30B-A3B) on agentic, tool-use, knowledge, instruction-following, math and coding benchmarks
LFM2.5-24B-A2B benchmarks, as published on the model card — Liquid AI

Liquid AI's published comparison: LFM2.5-24B-A2B against three MoE models on 16 benchmarks

BenchmarkLFM2.5-24B-A2BQwen3.6-35B-A3BGemma-4-26B-A4B-itNemotron-3.5-Lightning (30B-A3B)
AutomationBench27.698.725.462.61
BFCLv465.016557.0953.78
ToolSandbox80.7175.0272.0975.13
LiveClaw48.0938.1941.2537.72
PinchBench83.1889.9377.1284.2
τ³-Bench Banking8.047.634.547.01
WebArena Verified26.7537.6225.6228.69
GPQA Diamond74.4283.6974.972.42
AA-Omniscience-24.9-24.35-59.39-3.58
HLE7.47.698.575.65
IFEval96.7593.069294.19
IFBench74.6964.2147.4471.67
Multi-IF84.3881.5382.1982.34
MATH-50096.0496.7395.6696.4
SWE-Bench Verified (OpenCode)5166.225.853.4
SciCode32.7137.3535.4227.78

Comparison source ↗

This model's scores

  1. IFEval96.75%
  2. MATH-50096.04%
  3. Multi-IF84.38%
  4. PinchBench83.18%
  5. ToolSandbox80.71%
  6. IFBench74.69%
  7. GPQA Diamond74.42%
  8. BFCLv465.01%
  9. SWE-Bench Verified (OpenCode)51%
  10. LiveClaw48.09%
  11. SciCode32.71%
  12. AutomationBench27.69%
  13. WebArena Verified26.75%

Scores on a 0–100 scale (25-point gridlines); higher is better. Each benchmark links to its published source.

Pricing

Input$0.10 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.05 / 1M tokens
Output$1.00 / 1M tokens

Liquid Console API price at launch; new sign-ups receive $2 in credit

Pricing source ↗

Strengths

  • Agentic and tool-use scores ahead of larger MoEs on Liquid's comparison — 48.09 on LiveClaw and 27.69 on AutomationBench, against 38.19 and 8.72 for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
  • Top of its comparison on all three instruction-following benchmarks: IFEval 96.75, IFBench 74.69, Multi-IF 84.38
  • Fast on laptops and desktops: 184 tokens/s decode on an Apple M5 Max and 114 tokens/s on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 at Q4_K_M, in about 15–16 GB of memory
  • High-concurrency GPU serving past 21K output tokens/s on one NVIDIA B300
Line chart of output throughput versus concurrency on one NVIDIA B300 with SGLang, where LFM2.5-24B-A2B passes 20K tokens per second at 1024 concurrent requests, ahead of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Nemotron-3.5-Lightning and Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it
GPU inference: output throughput by concurrency on a single NVIDIA B300 (SGLang 0.5.22, BF16)Liquid AI model card ↗
  • Post-trained with reinforcement learning inside real agent harnesses (OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Pi, OpenCode)
  • Open weights in BF16, FP8, GGUF, ONNX and MLX formats, plus a base checkpoint for fine-tuning

Best for

  • Running a private coding or personal agent locally on a Mac or AMD laptop through an OpenAI-compatible server and a harness such as Hermes, OpenClaw or Pi
  • Tool-calling and automation workflows where instruction following and function calling matter more than stored knowledge
  • Retrieval- or search-augmented assistants, the pairing Liquid recommends for knowledge-heavy questions
  • High-throughput GPU serving of a reasoning model where a small active-parameter count keeps per-token cost low
  • Fine-tuning a compact agent model on proprietary data with Unsloth or TRL

How to access

ProviderModel ID
Liquid Console ↗—

FAQ

What does A2B mean in LFM2.5-24B-A2B?

About 2B active parameters. The model has 24.0B parameters in total, but its mixture-of-experts layers route each token to 4 of 64 experts, so only 2.45B parameters are active per token — which is what keeps generation fast on a laptop.

How is it different from LFM2-24B-A2B?

It keeps the same 40-layer hybrid architecture but extends the context window from 32K to 131K tokens, doubles the vocabulary from 65K to 128K tokens, roughly doubles pre-training from about 17T to 33T tokens, and adds agentic reinforcement learning. It is also a pure reasoning model that always thinks before answering, where LFM2-24B-A2B was not.

How fast is it on a laptop?

Liquid reports 184 tokens/s decode on an Apple M5 Max and 114 tokens/s on an AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, measured with llama.cpp at Q4_K_M quantization and a 4K-token input, using about 15–16 GB of memory.

What is it good and bad at?

On Liquid's comparison it leads on agentic tool-use benchmarks such as LiveClaw, AutomationBench and ToolSandbox and on instruction following (IFEval, IFBench, Multi-IF). Larger models beat it on knowledge-heavy tests like GPQA Diamond and on coding tests like SWE-Bench Verified, so Liquid recommends pairing it with retrieval or web search for knowledge-heavy tasks.

Can I use it commercially?

Under the LFM Open License v1.0, commercial use is permitted for companies below an annual revenue threshold of $10 million; above that, Liquid asks companies to contact its sales team for a commercial license. Research and non-profit use carry no threshold.

How much does the API cost?

At launch Liquid Console priced it at $0.10 per 1M input tokens ($0.05 cached) and $1.00 per 1M output tokens, with $2 of credit for new sign-ups.