Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.5 Pro
- Input
- $0.00 (free during experimental preview)
- Output
- $0.00 (free during experimental preview)
- Context
- 2M
- Released
- 2025-02-05
- Input
- $1.25 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $2.50 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K)
- Output
- $5.00 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $10.00 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K)
- Context
- Up to 2,097,152 tokens (2M) at general availability; launched at 1M tokens in Feb 2024, with a 128K standard tier at first
- Released
- 2024-02-15
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; Gemini 2.0 Pro is cheaper on input tokens ($0 vs $1.3 per 1M, ); Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window (2.097152M vs 2M).
Specs and pricing side by side
| Spec | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Googlesame | |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-02-15 |
| Context window | 2M | Up to 2,097,152 tokens (2M) at general availability; launched at 1M tokens in Feb 2024, with a 128K standard tier at first |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 8,192 tokenssame |
| Input price | $0.00 (free during experimental preview) | $1.25 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $2.50 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K) |
| Output price | $0.00 (free during experimental preview) | $5.00 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $10.00 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K) |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not publicly disclosed |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary (Google). Available only as a hosted API; not redistributable. |
| Weights | API only | API onlysame |
| Modalities | Text, Vision | text, image, audio, video, code |
| Knowledge cutoff | August 2024 | November 2023 |
Benchmarks both models report
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 79.1% | 76.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.7% | 53.5% |
Scores are as published by each maker or its cited source; harness, reasoning effort and date can differ between rows, so treat small gaps as ties. Sources are listed on each model page.
Which one should you pick?
Pick Gemini 2.0 Pro if…
- You care about MMLU-Pro, GPQA Diamond (it scores higher on 2 shared benchmarks).
- Cost matters: input tokens cost less ($0 vs $1.3 per 1M).
- You need Text / Vision input, which Gemini 1.5 Pro lacks.
- Your use case is: coding assistance and complex multi-step prompts (its primary positioning).
Pick Gemini 1.5 Pro if…
- You need the longer context (2.097152M vs 2M).
- You need text / image / audio / video / code input, which Gemini 2.0 Pro lacks.
- Your use case is: analyzing very long documents, contracts, or research-paper bundles in one pass.
FAQ
Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; Gemini 2.0 Pro is cheaper on input tokens ($0 vs $1.3 per 1M, ); Gemini 1.5 Pro has the larger context window (2.097152M vs 2M). The better pick depends on whether you value benchmark scores, price per token, context length or openness for your workload.
How much cheaper is Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro: $0.00 (free during experimental preview) input, $0.00 (free during experimental preview) output. Gemini 1.5 Pro: $1.25 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $2.50 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K) input, $5.00 / 1M tokens (prompts ≤128K); $10.00 / 1M tokens (prompts >128K) output (list API prices as published by each maker).
What are the context windows of Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro offers 2M with up to 8,192 tokens output; Gemini 1.5 Pro offers Up to 2,097,152 tokens (2M) at general availability; launched at 1M tokens in Feb 2024, with a 128K standard tier at first with up to 8,192 tokens output.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro was released 2025-02-05; Gemini 1.5 Pro was released 2024-02-15.
Go deeper
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- Gemini 1.5 Pro: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- gemini 2 5 pro vs gemini 2 0 pro
- gemini 1 5 pro vs gemini 1 0 pro
- gemini 1 5 pro vs mixtral 8x7b
- llama 4 scout vs gemini 2 0 pro
- gpt 5 pro vs gemini 2 0 pro
- claude 3 haiku vs gemini 1 5 pro
- All model comparisons
