Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash
- Input
- $0.06 / 1M tokens
- Output
- $0.40 / 1M tokens
- Context
- 200K
- Released
- 2026-01-19
- Input
- $0.50 / 1M tokens
- Output
- $3.00 / 1M tokens
- Context
- 1M
- Released
- 2025-12-17
Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.5 per 1M, 8.3×); Gemini 3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K); GLM-4.7-Flash ships open weights while Gemini 3 Flash is API-only.
Specs and pricing side by side
| Spec | GLM-4.7-Flash | Gemini 3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai (Zhipu / GLM) | |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2025-12-17 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 64K |
| Input price | $0.06 / 1M tokens | $0.50 / 1M tokens |
| Output price | $0.40 / 1M tokens | $3.00 / 1M tokens |
| Parameters | 30B total / 3B active (30B-A3B MoE) | Not disclosed |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| Weights | Open weights | API only |
| Modalities | Text | Text, Vision, Audio, Video, PDF |
| Knowledge cutoff | not published | January 2025 |
Benchmarks both models report
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Gemini 3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 59.2% | 78% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 14.4% | 33.7% |
Scores are as published by each maker or its cited source; harness, reasoning effort and date can differ between rows, so treat small gaps as ties. Sources are listed on each model page.
Which one should you pick?
Pick GLM-4.7-Flash if…
- Cost matters: input tokens cost 8.3× less ($0.1 vs $0.5 per 1M).
- You want to self-host or fine-tune (open weights, MIT).
- Your use case is: local and self-hosted AI coding assistants on a single GPU or capable workstation.
Pick Gemini 3 Flash if…
- You care about SWE-bench Verified, Humanity's Last Exam (it scores higher on 2 shared benchmarks).
- You need the longer context (1M vs 200K).
- You need Vision / Audio / Video / PDF input, which GLM-4.7-Flash lacks.
- Your use case is: high-volume production features where Gemini 3 Pro would be too slow or expensive.
FAQ
Which is better, GLM-4.7-Flash or Gemini 3 Flash?
Gemini 3 Flash scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.5 per 1M, 8.3×); Gemini 3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 200K); GLM-4.7-Flash ships open weights while Gemini 3 Flash is API-only. The better pick depends on whether you value benchmark scores, price per token, context length or openness for your workload.
How much cheaper is GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash: $0.06 / 1M tokens input, $0.40 / 1M tokens output. Gemini 3 Flash: $0.50 / 1M tokens input, $3.00 / 1M tokens output (list API prices as published by each maker).
What are the context windows of GLM-4.7-Flash and Gemini 3 Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash offers 200K with up to 128K output; Gemini 3 Flash offers 1M with up to 64K output.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash newer than Gemini 3 Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash was released 2026-01-19; Gemini 3 Flash was released 2025-12-17.
Go deeper
- GLM-4.7-Flash: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- Gemini 3 Flash: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- gemini 3 5 flash vs gemini 3 flash
- glm 4 7 flash vs kimi k2 thinking
- gemini 3 flash vs gemini 2 5 flash
- glm 5 3 flash vs glm 4 7 flash
- muse spark vs gemini 3 flash
- glm 4 7 flash vs minimax m2
- All model comparisons
