█

AI/TLDR

Buy me a coffee
Buy me a coffee

Model comparison

LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Hunyuan Hy3

Short answer

Hunyuan Hy3 scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; Hunyuan Hy3 has the larger context window (256K vs 128K).

Specs and pricing side by side

SpecLFM2.5-24B-A2BHunyuan Hy3
MakerLiquid AITencent
Released2026-10-132026-07-06
Context window128K256K
Input price$0.10¥1.00
Output price$1.00¥4.00
Parameters24.0B total · 2.45B active295B total · 21B active
LicenseLFM Open License v1.0Apache-2.0
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weightssame
ModalitiesTextTextsame

Not published by either maker: max output, knowledge cutoff.

Benchmarks both models report

BenchmarkLFM2.5-24B-A2BHunyuan Hy3
GPQA Diamond74.42%90.4%
SWE-Bench Verified51%78%

Scores are as published by each maker or its cited source; harness, reasoning effort and date can differ between rows, so treat small gaps as ties. Sources are listed on each model page.

Which one should you pick?

Pick LFM2.5-24B-A2B if…

  • Your use case is: running a private coding or personal agent locally on a Mac or AMD laptop through an OpenAI-compatible server and a harness such as Hermes, OpenClaw or Pi.

Pick Hunyuan Hy3 if…

  • You care about GPQA Diamond, SWE-Bench Verified (it scores higher on 2 shared benchmarks).
  • You need the longer context (256K vs 128K).
  • Your use case is: self-hosted agentic coding, tool use and terminal automation via vLLM or SGLang recipes.

FAQ

Which is better, LFM2.5-24B-A2B or Hunyuan Hy3?

Hunyuan Hy3 scores higher on 2 of the 2 benchmarks both models report; Hunyuan Hy3 has the larger context window (256K vs 128K). The better pick depends on whether you value benchmark scores, price per token, context length or openness for your workload.

What are the context windows of LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Hunyuan Hy3?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B offers 128K; Hunyuan Hy3 offers 256K.

Is LFM2.5-24B-A2B newer than Hunyuan Hy3?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B was released 2026-10-13; Hunyuan Hy3 was released 2026-07-06.

Go deeper