█

AI/TLDR

Hemmingway-1

A 27B open-weight writing model fine-tuned from Qwen3.8-27B for everyday messages and emails, released September 2026 under CC BY-NC 4.0.

HemmingwayOpen weightsGenerally available
Released
20 Sep 2026
Context
262,144 tokens
Parameters
27B
Input
$0.24 / 1M tokens
License
CC BY-NC 4.0 (commercial use by agreement)
Coverage
1 story

Overview

Hemmingway-1 is a 27B-parameter model from Hemmingway, published on Hugging Face under the Altworld organisation on September 20, 2026. It is built on Qwen3.8-27B and tuned for the writing people do every day: text messages, emails, the awkward note to a colleague. The model card's pitch is that when you ask for a text to your landlord you get the text, not three options, a preamble and notes about the options.

The weights were first posted under Apache-2.0 and relicensed on September 22, 2026 to CC BY-NC 4.0: free for personal, research and other non-commercial use, with commercial use by separate agreement. The model card lists a 262,144-token context and gives vLLM and Transformers recipes for running it locally.

Hemmingway also serves the model itself. The hosted API is OpenAI-compatible at https://hemmingway.io/v1 under the model id hemmingway-27b, accepts image parts as well as text, has thinking switched on by default, and caps a reply at 32,768 tokens including thinking. There are web, desktop and mobile apps alongside it.

Three of the benchmarks on the model card (CommunicationBench, Human-Likeness and StoryBench) are Hemmingway's own, and the card says so: blind pairwise matchups run in both orders, judged by a model that was not one of the contestants. The fourth, EQ-Bench 4, is the public emotional-intelligence benchmark, where Hemmingway reports a third-place score of 1330.

Released2026-09-20
LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0 (commercial use by agreement)
WeightsOpen weights
Parameters27B
Context262,144 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens on the hosted API (thinking included)
ArchitectureFine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B
ModalitiesText, Vision
StatusGenerally available

Benchmarks

Bar chart of CommunicationBench scores for everyday writing, texting and emails: Hemmingway-1 1026, Fable 5.1 1024, Fable 5 1009, GLM-5.3 1007, Kimi K3 996, GPT-6 Astra 976, Grok 4.6 967, DeepSeek V4 Pro 963, Qwen3.8 27B base 954
CommunicationBench is Hemmingway's internal benchmark: 80 real requests, blind pairwise matchups. — Hemmingway
Bar chart of Human-Likeness scores on CommunicationBench: Hemmingway-1 1032, Fable 5.1 1006, GLM-5.3 996, Fable 5 992, Kimi K3 985, GPT-6 Astra 964, Qwen3.8 27B base 952
Human-Likeness reruns the CommunicationBench matchups asking which of two answers a person wrote (internal). — Hemmingway
Bar chart of EQ-Bench 4 emotional-intelligence scores: Hemmingway-1 1330, Fable 5 1341, Kimi K3 1332, GPT-5.5 1316, Opus 4.7 1312, Opus 4.8 1285
EQ-Bench 4 is the public emotional-intelligence benchmark, run by its own harness. — Hemmingway
Bar chart of StoryBench creative-writing scores: Hemmingway-1 1197, Fable 5 Max 1277, GLM-5.3 1254, Kimi K3 1197, Qwen3.8 Max 1081, DeepSeek V4 Pro 1054, Qwen3.8 27B base 693
StoryBench is Hemmingway's internal creative-writing benchmark. — Hemmingway

Hemmingway-1 against the models on its own model card. CommunicationBench and Human-Likeness are Hemmingway's internal benchmarks; EQ-Bench 4 is public.

BenchmarkHemmingway-1Fable 5.1Fable 5GLM-5.3Kimi K3GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6DeepSeek V4 ProQwen3.8 27B (base)
CommunicationBench (everyday writing, internal)1026102410091007996976967963954
Human-Likeness (internal)10321006992996985964——952
Replies wrapped in commentary (lower is better, internal)39%67%93%93%92%4%22%—19%
EQ-Bench 4 (public)1330—1341—1332————

Comparison source ↗

Pricing

Input$0.24 / 1M tokens
Cached input$0.024 / 1M tokens
Output$0.90 / 1M tokens

Hosted hemmingway-27b API; the open weights are free for non-commercial use.

Pricing source ↗

Strengths

  • Tops Hemmingway's own CommunicationBench of 80 everyday writing requests at 1026, ahead of Fable 5.1 (1024), GLM-5.3 (1007), Kimi K3 (996) and GPT-6 Astra (976)
  • Scores 1032 on the Human-Likeness rerun of those matchups, 26 points clear of Fable 5.1 at 1006
  • Wraps 39% of replies in commentary or options, against 93% for Fable 5 and GLM-5.3 and 92% for Kimi K3 in the same test
  • 1330 on the public EQ-Bench 4, above GPT-5.5 (1316), Opus 4.7 (1312) and Opus 4.8 (1285)
  • Open weights with a 262,144-token context, plus an OpenAI-compatible hosted API that also reads images

Best for

  • Reach for it when you need a message, email or reply drafted in a natural voice rather than a list of options with commentary.
  • Reach for it when you want a self-hostable 27B writing model for personal or research use under a non-commercial licence.
  • Reach for it when an app already speaks the OpenAI Chat Completions format and you want to swap in a writing-tuned model by changing the base URL and model id.
  • Look elsewhere for adversarial storytelling and long story turns, where the model card's own category breakdown shows it losing to the story-focused models.

How to access

ProviderModel ID
Hemmingway API ↗hemmingway-27b
Hugging Face (weights) ↗Altworld/Hemmingway-1

FAQ

What is Hemmingway-1 built on?

Hemmingway-1 is a 27B-parameter fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B, tuned for everyday writing such as messages, emails and notes to colleagues. The model card lists a 262,144-token context.

Can I use Hemmingway-1 commercially?

Not without an agreement. The weights are licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows personal, research and other non-commercial use with credit; commercial use needs a separate agreement with Hemmingway. The weights were briefly posted under Apache-2.0 on release day and relicensed on September 22, 2026.

How much does the Hemmingway-1 API cost?

The hosted API charges $0.24 per million input tokens, $0.024 per million cached input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens. It is OpenAI-compatible at https://hemmingway.io/v1 with the model id hemmingway-27b, and a reply is capped at 32,768 tokens including thinking.

How does Hemmingway-1 compare with larger models?

On Hemmingway's own CommunicationBench it scores 1026, ahead of Fable 5.1 (1024), GLM-5.3 (1007), Kimi K3 (996) and GPT-6 Astra (976). On the public EQ-Bench 4 it scores 1330, behind Fable 5 (1341) and Kimi K3 (1332). On the internal StoryBench it ties Kimi K3 at 1197, below Fable 5 Max and GLM-5.3.