AI/TLDR

K2 Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B

The sparse member of IFM's fully open K2 Horizon fleet, released September 2026 — 36B total parameters with roughly 4B active per token, built on IFM's Mixture-of-Value Attention.

K2 HorizonOpen weightsGenerally available
Released
3 Sep 2026
Context
512K
Parameters
36B total · 4B active
License
Apache-2.0

Overview

K2 Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B is the sparse model in K2 Horizon, the six-model fleet the Institute of Foundation Models released on 3 September 2026 alongside the 0.9B, 3.7B, 7B, 32B and 375B-A23B sizes. It stores 36 billion parameters and runs about 4 billion of them per token, and takes text input across a native 524,288-token context window carried from the midtraining stages onward.

Its distinguishing piece is MoVA, IFM's Mixture-of-Value Attention. Conventional Mixture-of-Experts designs apply sparsity to the feed-forward layers: many experts exist, but a router picks a small subset per token. MoVA extends that routing into multi-head attention itself, which IFM describes as opening another dimension for scaling capacity beyond the feed-forward network. IFM positions the 36B-A4B and the dense 32B as a matched pair — trained under the same conditions on the same data — so researchers can compare dense and sparse architectures directly.

On IFM's published table, the model scores 80.8 on GPQA Diamond, 66.3 on AA-LCR long-context reasoning, 58.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, 38.9 on SciCode, 26.8 on tau3-Banking agentic tool use and 25.2 on Humanity's Last Exam without tools. IFM compares it against open-weight models up to 15 times its total size: it leads Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B) on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and tau3-Banking while trailing it on GPQA Diamond and Humanity's Last Exam. IFM also states that under the same training conditions the model performs only slightly below the dense Horizon 32B while activating far fewer parameters.

Like the rest of the fleet it ships under Apache-2.0 with more than the weights. IFM publishes training data or detailed construction recipes, training code, model configurations, intermediate checkpoints, fine-grained training logs and evaluation results across the whole fleet; the 36B-A4B card notes that its final checkpoint is out and that intermediate checkpoints, data and training code follow. Each model in the fleet was pretrained on roughly 20 trillion tokens, about 10 trillion of them synthetic, with nearly 17% of the pre-training corpus made up of explicit problem-solving trajectories.

Serving recipes are published for vLLM and SGLang, the latter validated on 2× H200. Both use the `k2_horizon` reasoning and tool-call parsers, and IFM asks for `reasoning_effort="high"`, `temperature=1.0` and `top_p=0.95` — the settings all of its reported results were produced with. IFM is a research institute the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence launched in May 2025, continuing the fully-open line of work it began with the 2023 LLM360 paper.

Released2026-09-03
LicenseApache-2.0
WeightsOpen weights
Parameters36B total · 4B active
Context512K
ArchitectureMixture-of-Experts feed-forward layers combined with MoVA — Mixture-of-Value Attention, IFM's own design that extends expert routing into multi-head attention instead of applying sparsity only to the feed-forward network. About 4 billion of the 36 billion parameters are active per token. IFM says MoVA stays compatible with FlashAttention, grouped-query attention and sparse attention.
ModalitiesText
StatusGenerally available

Benchmarks

IFM's published comparison against open-weight models, transcribed from the model card. Scores are percentages; baseline figures come from Artificial Analysis, with Muse Glimmer-30B at high reasoning effort and the other open models in their reasoning mode.

BenchmarkK2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4BNemotron 3 UltraNemotron 3 SuperG9v3-39A5BQwen3.6-35B-A3BMuse Glimmer-30BGemma 4 31B-it
Total parameters36B550B120B39B35B30B31B
Active parameters4B55B12B5B3B30B31B
ArchitectureMoEMoEMoEMoEMoEDenseDense
tau3-Banking (agentic tool use)26.8%14.2%10.3%22.1%9.3%23.5%14.8%
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (agentic terminal use)58.6%53.9%38.6%32.6%44.9%51.7%43.4%
SciCode (scientific coding)38.9%39.9%36%34%35.8%43.6%43.4%
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)25.2%28.4%20.8%17.5%22.2%22%23.6%
GPQA Diamond (graduate-level science QA)80.8%86.7%80%80.5%84.1%83.5%85.7%
CritPt (frontier physics reasoning)2.1%3.1%3.1%0.3%0.3%2.6%1.4%
AA-LCR (long-context reasoning)66.3%71%60.3%62%66.7%80%68.3%
AA-Omniscience Accuracy18.8%22.6%24.3%14.9%18.8%27%20%
AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination69.2%70.3%13%87%49.5%18.1%15%

Comparison source ↗

This model's scores

  1. GPQA Diamond (graduate-level science QA)80.8%
  2. AA-LCR (long-context reasoning)66.3%
  3. Terminal-Bench 2.1 (agentic terminal use)58.6%
  4. SciCode (scientific coding)38.9%
  5. tau3-Banking (agentic tool use)26.8%
  6. Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)25.2%
  7. AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination69.2%
  8. AA-Omniscience Accuracy (factual accuracy)18.8%
  9. CritPt (frontier physics reasoning)2.1%

Scores on a 0–100 scale (25-point gridlines); higher is better. Each benchmark links to its published source.

Strengths

  • Frontier-adjacent scores at roughly 4B active parameters per token
  • 58.6 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and 26.8 on tau3-Banking, ahead of every open-weight peer in IFM's table including the 550B Nemotron 3 Ultra
  • 512K-token native context window
  • Apache-2.0 weights, with training data recipes, code, logs and intermediate checkpoints published across the fleet
  • Runs on 2 GPUs under the validated SGLang and vLLM recipes
  • Shares architecture, vocabulary, tooling and evaluation setup with the other five Horizon sizes, so moving between them takes no rewriting

Best for

  • Reach for it when you want agentic and reasoning quality close to a 32B dense model but with a fraction of the per-token compute
  • Reach for it for local-workstation and efficient-serving deployments that still need tool use and terminal work
  • Reach for it for long-document and repo-scale work that needs the 512K-token window
  • Reach for it for research comparing sparse against dense training, since IFM trained it and the 32B under matched conditions
  • Look at K2 Horizon 375B-A23B instead when quality matters more than serving cost, or at the 7B and smaller sizes for on-device work

How to access

ProviderModel ID
Self-hosted (vLLM) ↗IFM/K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B
Self-hosted (SGLang) ↗IFM/K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B

K2 Horizon — every version

The full lineage of the K2 Horizon line, newest first. Every version has its own page — click any to compare specs, benchmarks and pricing.

VersionReleasedContextLicense
K2 Horizon 375B-A23Bcurrent2026-09-03512KApache-2.0
K2 Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B2026-09-03512KApache-2.0
K2 Horizon 32B2026-09-03512KApache-2.0
K2 Horizon 7B2026-09-03512KApache-2.0

FAQ

What is K2 Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B?

It is the sparse model in K2 Horizon, the six-model fleet the Institute of Foundation Models released on 3 September 2026. It holds 36 billion parameters and activates roughly 4 billion per token, has a native 524,288-token context window, and ships under Apache-2.0.

What is MoVA?

MoVA is IFM's Mixture-of-Value Attention. Standard Mixture-of-Experts designs put sparsity in the feed-forward layers — many experts exist, but a router activates only a few per token. MoVA extends expert routing into multi-head attention as well, which IFM describes as a second dimension for scaling capacity. IFM says it remains compatible with FlashAttention, grouped-query attention and sparse attention.

How does it compare with the dense K2 Horizon 32B?

IFM trained the two under the same conditions specifically so they could be compared, and says the 36B-A4B performs only slightly below the dense 32B while activating far fewer parameters per token. On IFM's published tables the 36B-A4B is ahead on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (58.6 vs 36.6), SciCode (38.9 vs 30.2), Humanity's Last Exam (25.2 vs 22.8), tau3-Banking (26.8 vs 22.5) and AA-LCR (66.3 vs 65.3), and behind on GPQA Diamond (80.8 vs 82.3). The 32B figures are for a stage-1 checkpoint.

How does it compare with larger open-weight models?

On IFM's table it leads Nemotron 3 Ultra — a 550B model with 55B active parameters — on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (58.6 vs 53.9) and tau3-Banking (26.8 vs 14.2), and trails it on GPQA Diamond (80.8 vs 86.7) and Humanity's Last Exam (25.2 vs 28.4). Baseline scores in that table come from Artificial Analysis.

How do I run K2 Horizon MoVA 36B-A4B?

The Apache-2.0 weights are on Hugging Face. IFM publishes a vLLM recipe and an SGLang recipe validated on 2× H200, both using tensor and expert parallelism of 2, BF16 and the k2_horizon reasoning and tool-call parsers. IFM asks for reasoning_effort="high", temperature=1.0 and top_p=0.95 — the settings behind all of its reported results.

What else is in the K2 Horizon fleet?

Six sizes share the same architecture, vocabulary and training methodology: 0.9B for constrained devices such as watches and glasses, 3.7B and 7B for phones and on-device apps, a dense 32B and this sparse 36B-A4B for local workstations, and a 375B-A23B for enterprise deployments.