Model comparison
Laguna S 2.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash
- Input
- $0.09
- Output
- $0.18
- Context
- 1M
- Released
- 2026-07-21
- Input
- $0.22 off-peak · $0.44 peak
- Output
- $0.66 off-peak · $1.32 peak
- Context
- 1M
- Released
- 2026-04-24
DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores higher on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both models report; Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.2 per 1M, 2.4×).
Specs and pricing side by side
| Spec | Laguna S 2.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Poolside | DeepSeek |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-04-24 |
| Context window | 1M | 1Msame |
| Max output | not published | 384K |
| Input price | $0.09 | $0.22 off-peak · $0.44 peak |
| Output price | $0.18 | $0.66 off-peak · $1.32 peak |
| Parameters | 118B total · 8B active | 284B total · 13B active |
| License | OpenMDW-1.1 | MIT |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weightssame |
| Modalities | Text | Textsame |
Not published by either maker: knowledge cutoff.
Benchmarks both models report
| Benchmark | Laguna S 2.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 70.2% | 82.7% |
| Toolathlon Verified | 49.7% | 70.3% |
| DeepSWE | 40.4% | 54.4% |
Scores are as published by each maker or its cited source; harness, reasoning effort and date can differ between rows, so treat small gaps as ties. Sources are listed on each model page.
Which one should you pick?
Pick Laguna S 2.1 if…
- Cost matters: input tokens cost 2.4× less ($0.1 vs $0.2 per 1M).
- Your use case is: reach for it when you want to move high-volume agentic coding off a metered API and onto your own hardware without giving up long-horizon performance.
Pick DeepSeek-V4-Flash if…
- You care about Terminal-Bench 2.1, Toolathlon Verified, DeepSWE (it scores higher on 3 shared benchmarks).
- Your use case is: high-volume agentic and coding workflows where cost and latency matter more than absolute peak quality.
FAQ
Which is better, Laguna S 2.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash scores higher on 3 of the 3 benchmarks both models report; Laguna S 2.1 is cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $0.2 per 1M, 2.4×). The better pick depends on whether you value benchmark scores, price per token, context length or openness for your workload.
How much cheaper is Laguna S 2.1?
Laguna S 2.1: $0.09 input, $0.18 output. DeepSeek-V4-Flash: $0.22 off-peak · $0.44 peak input, $0.66 off-peak · $1.32 peak output (list API prices as published by each maker).
What are the context windows of Laguna S 2.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
Laguna S 2.1 offers 1M; DeepSeek-V4-Flash offers 1M with up to 384K output.
Is Laguna S 2.1 newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash?
Laguna S 2.1 was released 2026-07-21; DeepSeek-V4-Flash was released 2026-04-24.
Go deeper
- Laguna S 2.1: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash: full specs, pricing and benchmarks
- deepseek v4 pro vs deepseek v4 flash
- hunyuan hy4 preview vs laguna s 2 1
- deepseek v4 pro vs laguna s 2 1
- deepseek v4 flash vision exp vs laguna s 2 1
- kimi k3 vs deepseek v4 flash
- deepseek v4 flash vs gemma 4
- All model comparisons
